4.0 KiB
Discord Link Ingest Interest Profile
Updated: 2026-06-28 Source: discrawl read-only analysis of Yuta/toymaker Discord messages.
Author IDs considered
890593691440398456— yuta, historical messages through 2025-03-24890908900520505354— toymaker, current identity through 2026-06-28
Evidence snapshot
- Total messages by these identities in archive: 42,677
- URL-containing messages: 13,169
- Top channels by message volume:
💭|yuta,chat,notes - Recent URL domains are heavily technical/source-oriented:
github.com,x.com,github.blog,zenn.dev,openai.com,blog.cloudflare.com,docs.litellm.ai,scrapbox.io,obsidian.md,hermes-agent.nousresearch.com,alphaxiv.org. - Keyword signals: AI/LLM, X/Twitter, development/code, workflow automation, wiki/knowledge management, agents/Hermes.
Current scoring bias
Start strict. The wiki should remain curated; raw sources are acceptable, but wiki-page upgrades should require durable reuse value.
Score 4 — create/update substantial wiki pages
Use for sources that are central to one of these durable themes:
- LLM Wiki / compiled knowledge bases / Obsidian / knowledge management systems
- AI agents, Hermes Agent, Codex/Claude/OpenCode-style automation, multi-agent workflows
- Developer tooling that changes Yuta's automation/dev workflow materially
- Quality engineering, security, supply-chain, infra reliability for AI/software systems
- Technical writeups with implementation details likely to be referenced later
- Niche, exciting design/hack/Hacker News-like material, especially when it exposes an unusual technique, tool, interface, or way of thinking
- Public-interest/public-sector technology, civic infrastructure, accessibility (a11y), inclusive design, and systems that make services more usable or equitable
- Papers or research with clear relevance to LLMs, agents, evaluation, knowledge systems, automation, accessibility, or public-interest technology
Score 3 — update existing page only
Use when the source adds a concrete fact, method, comparison, or implementation note to an existing page, but does not deserve a new page.
Score 2 — raw/articles only
Use for interesting but not-yet-connected sources:
- good one-off articles
- news with possible future relevance
- tools/repos worth remembering but not yet central
- X/Twitter links only when they point to durable technical content or a thread with reusable insight
Score 1 — state/link-only
Use for URLs whose title/context is notable but body extraction fails or value is unclear.
Score 0 — skip
- ads/campaigns
- memes/ephemeral posts
- shallow news with no later reuse value
- duplicate URLs
- login-only pages where no useful content is extractable
- media-only links unless explicitly tied to a technical/knowledge workflow
Per-domain handling hints
github.com: prioritize repos, READMEs, issues/PRs, commits related to automation, agents, LLMs, dev infra, security, QE. Skip personal one-off commits unless message context says they matter.x.com: do not auto-upgrade by default. Use only for high-signal technical threads or links to durable sources.zenn.dev,github.blog,openai.com,blog.cloudflare.com, technical docs/blogs: usually score 2+, score 3/4 if aligned with above themes.- newspapers/general news: usually score 0-2 unless strongly connected to cyber/security/AI policy or a durable thesis.
- YouTube: usually link-only unless transcript/title/context indicates durable technical value.
Style notes
- Prefer natural Japanese prose. Avoid unnecessary katakana and English jargon when a clear Japanese term works.
- Do not force every source into an LLM Wiki framing. Public-interest, design, accessibility, information integrity, and hack/design topics can stand on their own when that is the natural framing.
Learning rule
After each run, if repeated keep/skip decisions reveal a stable preference, append one compact note here or to state.md. Prefer explicit evidence from Discord messages over assumptions from short Hermes conversations.